Every counterparty from every angle.

It starts from one set of documents and the CRM record, and runs every module your review type calls for. On the credit side that means financial analysis, industry risk and a credit rating; on the compliance side, KYB and ownership, sanctions and PEP screening and adverse media; and on the commercial side, the sales commentary, pricing, volumes and proposed terms. It then scores the counterparty against your rating scale and drafts the memo in your template with every line cited, so an underwriter opens a finished review in under an hour rather than assembling one over days.

The financial statements you upload, the counterparty's entire website, over 300 global watchlists screened on the company and every officer behind it, thousands of media sources in its own market and language plus millions of other websites, and the business case from your CRM. Which modules run on all of that depends on the review type, whether that is merchant underwriting, corporate credit risk, KYB checks, trade credit, brand risk or something else, and your team sets that selection.

Yes. The rating scale your leadership sets carries weighted quantitative and qualitative factors. The ratios from the spread, scored against your appetite thresholds, sit on the quantitative side, and industry risk, ownership, the compliance findings and the business case sit on the qualitative side. The score and the recommendation follow from both.

Yes. Every review ends in a memo drafted in the template your leadership set for that department, whether that is a two-page renewal note or a full committee pack, and every line in it is cited to its source. Your analyst edits it and signs it off, and it can be delivered as a file or over the API.

Yes. Your leadership sets the memo template for each department, the compliance policy by industry or merchant category along with its review cycle, and the rating scale with its weighted factors, and the ratios are scored against your own appetite thresholds. Every review applies all of that, and if your team works to any other risk policy, you can give it to us and we adopt it into the recommendation.

Yes. The review arrives as an editable draft with every figure and finding cited, so the underwriter checks it against the sources, changes whatever needs changing and signs it off. Anything that was flagged along the way, whether a watchlist match, an adverse-media item or a ratio outside your appetite, is carried into the draft for the underwriter to decide on.

Yes. Every line carries the source it came from, whether that is the page of the document you uploaded, the page of the counterparty's website, the ownership record, the watchlist or the media item. An analyst, the credit committee or an auditor can open that source and check any statement in the memo against it.

Yes. Every review of a given type runs the same modules, is scored against the same rating scale and lands in the same memo template, whoever runs it. Two underwriters looking at similar counterparties end up with reviews a committee can compare line for line.

Yes. It works with any CRM, Salesforce included. The business case comes in from the CRM record with the sales commentary, pricing, volumes and proposed terms, and the result of the review is pushed back to that record so your sales reps see it where they already work. Your other systems can connect over the API, which returns each review with its citations.

It watches for them. Once a counterparty is approved, you set how often it is reviewed again and which modules the re-run covers. New accounts get re-spread, ratios get re-scored against your appetite, screening is refreshed on your schedule, and anything that moved is flagged for your analyst.

Yes. Anything you already hold on the counterparty can go into the review alongside the documents, so transaction processing data, loan and repayment history, the merchant's or company's replies to your questions over email, and your team's own notes. The modules read it together with everything else, and it feeds the analysis and the memo like any other source.

An assistant can only reason about what you paste into it, and when it does go looking it tends to stop after a handful of sources, whether because of a usage limit or because it simply stops searching. It has no access to the watchlists, the media coverage or your CRM record, it does not know your policies or your rating scale, and it cannot show you where a claim came from. TrustPlus AI works through over 300 global watchlists, thousands of media sources and millions of other websites, reads the counterparty's entire website, applies your policies and cites every line, so the review can be checked and defended, and your data is never used to train a model.